2011/7/10 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > <snip> > >> The LICENSE and NOTICE stuff in the source and binary releases isn't >> great but probably isn't harmful. Needs to be addressed before the >> next release. > > Now is perhaps a good time to ask ourselves whether we should continue > to ship the binary. > > Opinions?
I think the binary is useful. 1) the bin is the only package including all of the jars we produce. 2) the bin was expected to work via command line using java -jar apache-jspf-resolver-0.9.9.jar and work like the spfquery command line tool (I just tested it works for 0.9.9 if you move lib/* to the main folder). #2 is my main reason to keep releasing the binary. What's the problem with its LICENSE/NOTICE? (IIRC we agreed that was OK to use a single LICENSE/NOTICE tuple in this case because even the source distro has non-ALv2 contents to be declared and providing multiple LICENSE/NOTICE is more caothic than having one including informations about artifacts that *may* be included in each released package). Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
