On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:29, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: >> I still think that we should better have a source package to be voted >> and this vote didn't include a source package
<snip> > However, as you point out, reviewing binary artifacts is not > sufficient to vet a release. > > My interpretation is that technically this vote is about the > james/server/trunk code at rev 1145273, as is currently contained in > (and per convention this will never change) > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/tags/james-server-3.0-beta2/ The source artifact is created by the master pom but this didn't seem to get uploaded correctly :-/ Robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
