On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/7/14 <[email protected]>: >> Author: rdonkin >> Date: Thu Jul 14 11:08:17 2011 >> New Revision: 1146650 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1146650&view=rev >> Log: >> JSPF-91 Remove information that no longer reflects source in version >> control. Updated copyright. >> [...] >> Modified: james/jspf/trunk/NOTICE.txt >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jspf/trunk/NOTICE.txt?rev=1146650&r1=1146649&r2=1146650&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- james/jspf/trunk/NOTICE.txt (original) >> +++ james/jspf/trunk/NOTICE.txt Thu Jul 14 11:08:17 2011
<snip> >> - This product contains resources (SPF parser tests: test_parser.txt >> - and test_rfc_examples.txt) derived from the libspf2 library >> - (http://www.libspf2.org/) and distributed under the BSD license >> - and copyright by Wayne Schlitt, Shevek. >> - (see resolver\src\test\resources\org\apache\james\jspf\libspf2.LICENSE) The directory now contains only two files [1]. Embedding the license within each of these documents would make license tracking easier. Any objections? The license [2] we use is the 2-clause BSD [3] offered. The requires that we reproduce the license when distributing in binary form. AFACT this is distributed only in source form as part of the test jar so this clause doesn't apply. Robert [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jspf/trunk/resolver/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/ [2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/james/jspf/trunk/resolver/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/libspf2.LICENSE?view=markup [3] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
