I agree, we should use the same logging framework.

- Manolo

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]
> wrote:

> +1 to move to slf4j
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
>
> 2011/9/28 Felix Knecht <[email protected]>:
> > IIRC at least James-Server uses slf4j and not commons-logging. Maybe hupa
> > should also use slf4j to be constant in using the same logging facade?
> >
> > On 09/28/2011 12:03 AM, Felix Knecht wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Manolo
> >>
> >> Comments inline
> >>
> >> On 09/27/2011 07:11 PM, Manuel Carrasco Mońino wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Felix,
> >>> Demo is a set of messages used for unit testting. Those messages are
> used
> >>> for demoing, in demo mode we inject mock imap and smpt
> >>> implementations, so
> >>> there is no imap connection nor smtp (although it is possible to
> deliver
> >>> smtp if it is configured).
> >>
> >> I'm quite sure we can use a dummy mail server (like greenmail, see
> >> later) to contain and deliver these demo message also.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I think we could move those classes/resources to the test folder but
> demo
> >>> mode is pretty useful when developing or testing the app before
> >>> configuring
> >>> it. I prefer to leave these classes here instead of creating a package
> >>> to be
> >>> shared by test and production war.
> >>
> >> What do you mean by 'test war'? IMO a 'production war' should not
> >> contain code used only for running tests but not in productivity. There
> >> should be another way to do this.
> >> Some tests may have to be run as integration tests - not only test. So a
> >> dummy mail server can be started before the integration tests are run
> >> and be shutdown after the integration test. Maybe we can use greenmail
> >> (http://www.icegreen.com/greenmail/) for this.
> >>
> >> I can imaging that the application run as demo also bases on such a
> >> dummy server.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> BTW, I have some code I started to port HUPA to use the Request
> >>> Factory in
> >>> gwt-2.4.0, I did not finished it since 2.2 and 2.3 had an important
> >>> memory
> >>> leak issue, which it seems fixed in 2.4.0, may I commit it?, or better
> >>> could
> >>> we use this or another thread to propose a set of changes hupa needs.
> >>
> >> No problem, go ahead and commit it. Hupa has - as far as I can see -
> >> never been released, so everything can be done.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> - Manolo
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Felix Knecht<[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all
> >>>>
> >>>> According to HUPA-25 [1] there should be a running demo of hupa at
> >>>> [2]. It
> >>>> isn't - I know, it's an open issue.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why I come to this? I found several classes in the productive (not
> test)
> >>>> part in the server module to enable running the demo. I wonder if
> >>>> there's
> >>>> really a need to 'pollute' productive parts with code used only to run
> a
> >>>> demo?
> >>>>
> >>>> What about removing this 'demo-code' from the productive part and find
> >>>> another way to run a demo if ever?
> >>>>
> >>>> WDOT?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>> Felix
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/HUPA-25<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUPA-25>
> >>>>
> >>>> [2]
> >>>>
> >>>> http://james.zones.apache.org:**8080/hupa/<
> http://james.zones.apache.org:8080/hupa/>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> >>>>
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> >>>>
> >>>> server-dev-unsubscribe@james.**apache.org<
> [email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> >>>> [email protected].**org<[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to