yeah maybe as I can not see another problem. Please retry with latest snapshot.
thanks norman Am Sonntag, 9. Oktober 2011 schrieb Eric Charles <[email protected]>: > In my case, I don't think it is caused by a concurrent session having deleted the message. > > I would need to further debug, but message was in the subfolder on disk and was not deleted. Maybe moved from a thunderbird filter moving a message from INBOX to a that subfolder... > > Thx, > Eric > > On 09/10/11 19:39, Norman Maurer wrote: > > Hi there, > > at least we will now ignore such problems as it may happen because of > concurrent sessions. > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-346 > > Anyway that does not explain your problem. I would like to debug this > futher as the message seems to be clearly there. > > Bye, > Norman > > > 2011/10/9 Norman Maurer<[email protected]>: > > Hm... > > Can you include the full stacktrace ? > > 2011/10/9 Eric Charles<[email protected]>: > > mmh, I now see stacktraces with messages such as: > > org.apache.james.mailbox.MailboxException: No message found with uid 52589 > at > org.apache.james.imap.processor.StoreProcessor.setFlags(StoreProcessor.java:281) > > if I grep 52589 james-uidlist, I get > 52589 1318174914.64925dcb914212291293.srv002,S=4962:2,S > > more cur/1318174914.64925dcb914212291293.srv002,S=4962:2,S > shows me a valid mail. > > Thunderbird does not complain like yesterday "unable to select folder", but > fails to 'repair' the folder where I get such messages (it silently fails > after fetching a few messages). > > Back to older bet4 snapshot. > > hugh, > eric > > > On 09/10/11 18:07, Eric Charles wrote: > > I gave a try to today snapshot, and migration is now OK (no more issue). > Thx for the fix Norman! > I will commit tomorrow to log with error. > > I will further monitor for correct operation, but it seems like mailbox > is good here for release. > > Thx, > Eric > > On 08/10/11 20:33, Norman Maurer wrote: > > And this for more graceful handling: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-345 > > Bye, > Norman > > > 2011/10/8 Norman Maurer<[email protected]>: > > You are right... > > Loglevel adjusted :) > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMAP-343 > > Bye, > Norman > > 2011/10/8 Eric Charles<[email protected]>: > > yes, maildir. > > I already had such issue selecting a mailbox. > Removing james-uidlist james-uidvalidity made it work. > If I remember well, we are now skipping any invalid line in the > uidlist. > > This time, remove these files didn't help, this is why I raised the log > level > > Eric > > On 08/10/11 18:10, Norman Maurer wrote: > > Interesting... > > I will have a look later. what mailbox format you use ? maildir ? > > Bye, > Norman > > > 2011/10/8 Eric Charles<[email protected]>: > > Hi, > The spring for hbase is OK (maybe not exactly what we wanted, but > still > acceptable). > > I just tried to migrate to latest snapshot to validate protocols, but > felt > on an issue ("unable to select folder"). After raising log level > for imap > to > debug: > > org.apache.james.mailbox.MailboxException: No message found with > uid 505 > in > mailbox #private.INBOX.james-apache-org > at > > > org.apache.james.imap.processor.AbstractSelectionProcessor.unseen(AbstractSelectionProcessor.java:357) > > at > > > org.apache.james.imap.processor.AbstractSelectionProcessor.respond(AbstractSelectionProcessor.java:134) > > at > > > org.apache.james.imap.processor.AbstractSelectionProcessor.doProcess(AbstractSelectionProcessor.java:92) > > at > > > I don't know if this is related to a local bad > config/manipulation, to > imap, > to mailbox? >
