2011/12/19 Steve Brewin <sbre...@synsys.com>: >> - Could the api reside in lifecyle-api (or data-api?) and the >> implementation be moved to ldap module (does it make sense?) > > I don't think either are a natural fit. Should we find we use this approach > generally useful it should probably be offered up to Commons. As an interim > measure if people don't think james-server-util is a good home we could > establish a james-commons project. Personally I don't see an immediate need.
If we currently have only one module depending on this generic behaviour I would simply put everything in the final module. IF and WHEN we will have another module in need to depend on the generic behaviour we will have a real scenario and much more informations to judge if we need a new module for the api, if the api can be added to an existing api module or if we need another self container project outside from the "server" tree. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
