On 02/03/12 11:37, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
2012/3/2 Eric Charles<[email protected]>:
Cancelling. I will reroll.
Thx for your inputs :)
About rerolling I find that it is much better to not reuse release
names. So b4 has "failed" the release and we move to b5, otherwise
when you test/build/vote you always have to make sure you refer to the
right artifacts and you are testing/building against the right
artifacts... with maven it happens a lot that it will use "cached"
artifacts from the repository instead of the ones generated by the
current build tree.
I'm fine with both options.
I have already begun the rollback process, so it will be 'rollback' this
time. Let's talk about this the next time we have to cancel.
@stefano
Great tip to disable hbase test on windows. Thx!
Bringing back the app module in server? Maybe we could do this later, but
for this release, I will leave it as such.
What about at least trying to release both at the same time? At least
it will be easier to check it really runs.
I will to release:perform on the app module, assuming the 3.0b4
artifacts are in my local repo (they will not be resolvable from any
other repo).
Only one vote would thus be needed.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
eric | http://about.echarles.net | @echarles
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
