-1 JSF2 +1 GWT Like JSF2, GWT is a proved technology, open sourced, and apache-2 licensed.
GWT adds a set of benefices to James, mainly we continue being java centric and we dont need serious javascript, ajax nor html skills to understand the project, secondly we can deliver a product which is unit tested and javadoc-ed in all its components. I don't want to expose the benefices of developing large rich apps with gwt vs hand-written js because there is a lot of literature along the web. - Manolo On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Dhrubo <dhrubo.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we should move to JSF 2 than GWT which is mostly controlled by one > company. > Apache with its vision and endeavor for OSS we should use - JSF 2 - > Tomahawk (or Mojarra) + Primefaces > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan <stan.ieu...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > Pe 11.04.2012 18:48, echo a scris: > > > >> Hi Manolo > >> Very glad to see your reply. The reason why I want to choose the > >> gwt-platform > >> was that it is more smoothly to update from current Hupa's > >> state(gwt-presenter). > >> However, I like the native one rather than gwtp since it will import the > >> other > >> resources. What I really want to do is to replace the MVP by gwt itself. > >> I was > >> just afraid whether I can complete the proposal before the deadline of > >> GSoC, so > >> I asked for you advices. If possible, I want to use the core mvp in gwt > to > >> realize it. Over these days, I have been researching the Hupa project > and > >> GWT > >> technology and later on I want to show you something I am changing. > >> To the new features, I would like to implement as many features, that a > >> current > >> email client should have, as possible not only during the GSoC period, > >> but also > >> after that. And I am also keeping my eyes open on the Hupa's JIRA, where > >> some > >> wonderful ideas come out gradually. Sure I will give my deeper > >> discription after > >> my researching. I don't think it will be late. > >> Thanks a lot :) > >> > >> > >> Wish you a happy > >> > >> Hi Echo > >>> > >>> I've been reading your application and it looks right to me. > >>> One thing I see is that you have selected gwt-platform instead of the > >>> core mvp in gwt but you don't say any reason about why you prefer the > >>> first option. > >>> Also I'd like a deeper description of how you pretend to face new > >>> features, I mean components, persistence, customization etc. > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> - Manolo > >>> > >>> -- > >> cheers, > >> echo > >> > >> > > Hello Echo, > > > > Sound good. I'm not familiar with GWT and I would like to know more. Good > > luck with your research and send us the findings. > > > > Cheers. > > > > -- > > Ioan Eugen Stan > > http://ieugen.blogspot.com > > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.**apache.org< > server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.**org< > server-dev-h...@james.apache.org> > > > > > > > -- > Kind Regards... Dhrubo > > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo> >
