Pe 20.04.2012 16:38, Eric Charles a scris:
Thursday 3rd 16:00 GMT+1 is good to me. Ioan? Any one else?
I won't be able to talk with my voice (skype voice call), so we could do
it on the #james irc, a good occasion to have people out there (btw i
don't find directly a page with that information... we should have
better market and use it).
Topics for me:
- Do we need separate sites ? (e.g. one pure technical maintained via
svnpubush, another more marketing with cms...)
- Wiki roundup: some pages are outdated and could be removed, some pages
could be integrated in the web sites.
Thx,
Eric
It's ok for me. I'll set it in my calendar. Please send remainders the
day before (I will try to) so we don't forget.
The topics are on target. Thanks for making things explicit.
Cheers,
On 04/20/2012 02:20 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote:
For me is ok on Thursday the 3rd or Friday the 4th at any time-frame from
16:00 to 19:00 (Madrid).
- Manolo
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Ioan Eugen
Stan<[email protected]>wrote:
Hi,
2012/4/17 Manuel Carrasco Moñino<[email protected]>:
Hi all,
I'd like to attend
- Manolo
Great. Since Eric made the switch to svnpubsub we are in the green
with ASF infra and migration to Apache CMS is not urgent but I think
we should at least discuss it because it provides a more user friendly
way of writing documentation.
Since Eric is booked for the next week I propose to schedule a meeting
sometimes between 3-6 of May. I can make time for a 20 min chat almost
every time of day.
Please choose what's best for you.
Thanks,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Eric Charles<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Ioan,
Sure, We can definitively plan something, but if possible not in the
coming 2 weeks for me (I am really swapping atm...).
But don't hesitate to think, test, talk about this.
I carefully follow the Apache (and many others) CMS initiatives since
long, and my personal feeling is that one can never get all advantages
of a
one system.
For now, I just focus on setting-up a solution (svnpusub proposed by
apache infra) that will allow us to not be impacted by the rsync
mechanism
stop, and overall to deliver an updated documentation to our users
asap. As
Sefano said on a previous jira comment, whatever the solution (this
one
or
any other), we must secure the same minimal functions as now (skin,
automatic left/top menus, javadoc and report generation, same urls to
avoid
404, automatic content migration...).
Thx,
Eric
On 04/17/2012 01:25 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
Hi,
I think we should have an 20 min irc (google hang out?) meeting to
discuss
about site migration. It will be very helpfull for me to speak to all
involved parties.
From my knowledge most devs are in Europe so i sugest meeting
sometimes
in
the late day.> 18:00.
Who would like to attend and who don't?
Thanks,
--
eric | http://about.echarles.net | @echarles
------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.**apache.org<
[email protected]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected].**org<
[email protected]>
--
Ioan Eugen Stan
http://ieugen.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
--
Ioan Eugen Stan
http://ieugen.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
