Metrics is also a nice one:

http://metrics.codahale.com/

Bye,
Norman


2012/5/11 Eric Charles <e...@apache.org>:
> Also, did you look at the existing metrics we already have?
> http://james.apache.org/server/3/monitor-jmx.html
> How do you see them integrated?
> We'd better not stay with multiple monitoring systems.
>
> We also need to document this new feature (optional or not, how to configure
> to enable, disable,...).
>
> Thx,
> Eric
>
>
> On 05/11/2012 06:25 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
>>
>> On 05/10/2012 09:18 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Eric,
>>>
>>> 2012/5/10 Eric Charles<e...@apache.org>:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ioan,
>>>>
>>>> Alternative solution could be servo [1].
>>>> I didn't look at jetm yet but there are probably others.
>>>
>>>
>>> Took a quick look at servo, and has a lot of potential. It's very new
>>> so a lot of people didn't hear about it. I'm going to get a look at
>>> it, maybe I'll use it to re-factor some code for more clarity and add
>>> other metrics.
>>>
>>>> Although MAILBOX-152 is created since long, I think it's worth to
>>>> talk and
>>>> announce on mailing list when introducing such components. Everybody
>>>> could
>>>> then propose alternative/better solutions.
>>>
>>>
>>> You are right, but since nobody was against it and it required minimal
>>> intrusion I decided to go for it.
>>> I will be more verbose in the future.
>>
>>
>> Thx.
>>
>>>
>>> As a note, servo also requires to write some code while jetm doesn't
>>> so it can be turned off pretty easily.
>>>
>>
>> Servo needs annotations, which is not code, and the start of a server,
>> which can be made optional by configuration.
>>
>>> JMX monitoring is more powerful than what jetm offers. If needed we
>>> can provide jetm as an optional package since we can externalize it
>>> into a config file and provide a special build profile to include it
>>> so no harm done.
>>>
>>
>> Whatever the solution, I favor JMX to gather the metrics.
>> Does Jetm support this?
>>
>>> Since this discussion is open, let's have a "poll" to see what other
>>> monitoring solutions are there.
>>> If you've worked with something else please share yor experience.
>>>
>>
>> Never used such framework on other projects.
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>> Thx,
>>>>
>>>> Eric
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://techblog.netflix.com/2012/02/announcing-servo.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/10/2012 03:22 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've committed the changes needed to add jetm performance monitoring.
>>>>> It uses Spring AOP and can be enabled/ disa bled by configuration for
>>>>> every bean that we create.
>>>>>
>>>>> The project home-page shows some stuff that you can do with it:
>>>>> http://jetm.void.fm/views/monitoring_examples.html
>>>>>
>>>>> It's in the same bucket as JMX but it has the advantage of being very
>>>>> easy to enable/disable without code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> eric | http://about.echarles.net | @echarles
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> eric | http://about.echarles.net | @echarles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to