[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13983977#comment-13983977
 ] 

Mark commented on JAMES-1548:
-----------------------------

the profile to switch it is still there, but the most recent JavaMail version 
has a different groupId. In addition to that, some other james projects need to 
be updated too, then. I already have done all of that, including straightening 
the version stuff to avoid using multiple versions of the same module. Would 
you mind if I submit a patch including also the other changes? (Netty upgrade 
plus some minor tweaks)

> javax.mail - geronimo or oracle implementation?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JAMES-1548
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1548
>             Project: James Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mark
>            Priority: Minor
>
> It looks like Oracle's JavaMail implementation is a lot more recent than the 
> Geronimo implementation.
>             <dependency>
>                 <groupId>com.sun.mail</groupId>
>                 <artifactId>javax.mail</artifactId>
>                 <version>1.5.1</version>
>             </dependency>
> My main problem with Geronimo is that it does not support proper IMAP 
> authentication, therefore I *have* to use Oracle's implementation during my 
> integration tests. To avoid having multiple implementations hanging around 
> inside the same process (AFAIK you cannot just manage the release because of 
> differences in the internals used), I want to trigger a discussion about 
> whether it would be better to switch to Oracle JavaMail implementation. Their 
> bug reporting now seems independent of Oracle's own bug processing system, my 
> own inquiries have been answered pretty quickly and efficiently. Is there any 
> issue with the license? AFAIK it allows the distribution under the 
> GPL+classpath exception, so it should pose no hindrance except for the 
> requirement of proper license inclusion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to