On 15 Jul 2014 10:37, "Manuel Carrasco Moñino" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think nowadays producing a war for james is more confusing than just > having a .zip. > > I don't see any reason to run it in a war since we don't offer any web > service so far, and normally a webserver is recommended not run without > root permissions so it is difficult to listen to privileged ports. > > Could we remove that? >
Still today many enterprises deploy java components in a web container preferably. A poll on the user list could be a good way to determine the actual benefit of distributing the war, which by the way has never been contained in any release, afaik. i'm totally +/-0 on this topic. Bernd > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Bernd Fondermann < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Back in the days it was deemed desirable to embed James in a web container. > > We never came around building an EAR or something more advanced. > > > > Bernd > > On 14 Jul 2014 18:30, "Manuel Carrasco Moñino" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > Is there any reason for producing a .war file among the tar.gz and .zip > > in > > > the app/target folder? > > > > > > - Manolo > > > > >
