Sorry that's me, I get confused after a (long) day of work... Sorry for the noise...
Le 29/01/2015 18:52, Benoit Tellier a écrit : > Hi, > > I am writing a distributed event system for the James mailbox ( so that > IDLE imap command will work in a distributed environement ). Doing this, > I am starting to write tests on top of the existing James event system > and I notice this point : > > Listener per mailbox registration is not updated upon MailboxRenamed events. > > This implies that listeners do not receive any events after a > mailboxRenamed event (not even this event). > > To solve this, we must trigger MailboxRenamed events in the event loop, > and : > > - explicitly check from field with these kind of events, and notify clients > > - I do not know if we should still be connected in IDLE after a mailbox > rename... rfc2177 is not clear about that,so I don't know if it makes > sens to change the path listener are listening on (move listeners > listening to the old path to the new path ). > > But I really think they should be notified about the mailboxRenamed event. > > What do you think of it? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
