Hi, I just uploaded a patch for Mailbox-155 .
I will apply a patch for Mailbox-217 , MAILBOX-220 and MAILBOX-215 tommorow. I will soon attach patch for MAILBOX-211 ( distributed mailbox event system based on Kafka and possibly (if needed) ZooKeeper ). We will rework Cassandra related issue in java 8 before integrating it in James. On 04/13/15 14:31, Matthieu Baechler wrote: > Hi, > > Le 11/04/2015 19:01, Eric Charles a écrit : >> See answers in line >> >> On 04/09/2015 10:38 AM, Matthieu Baechler wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I work for an free software company, Linagora, and with my team, we >>> are working to have James fit our needs. >>> Two of our interns already submitted some code regarding Cassandra >>> support and some bugfixes on James itself (Philippe Benoit and >>> Benoit Tellier). >>> We are making our team bigger and have multiple goals that I'd like >>> to share with you: >>> 1. have James 3.0 released ! >>> 2. writing backends to run James on Cassandra/ElasticSearch/Kafka >>> 3. write some mailet or other extensions to match our products >>> functional needs >>> >> >> Great! >> >> Could you list the opened jira with contributions? I will review and >> commit. > Benoit Tellier will reply to this mail to list his waiting contributions. > > I've just created MAILBOX-221 and MAILBOX-222 to bring the changes > about jdk versions. > >>> So we are currently working to contribute all the code we wrote for >>> goal 2. >>> >>> In this regard, I'd like to know several things : >>> >>> - I see in james-parent 1.8.3-SNAPSHOT that James targets java 6. >>> What about pushing it to java 7 now that Java 6 is end-of-life ? >>> >> >> It would be better to release 3.0.0 on java 6 and migrate to java 7 >> for the next release. > Great, let's do this. MAILBOX-221 will enforce this (for mailbox). >> >>> - is it acceptable to contribute backends that require java 8 (with >>> some magic to disable build if java < 8). We would really like >>> writing modern Java for our modules ! >>> >> >> Sure, but it would be released for 3.0.0+ >> jdk7 or jdk8 will be subject to discussion. > > See MAILBOX-222 then. >> >>> - Could James projet make use of apache integration >>> (https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and) >>> with github to accept contributions ? I know some others apache >>> projects amend their contribution guidelines to make it possible ( >>> https://mahout.apache.org/developers/github.html ). We could just >>> import their practices into James, don't you think ? >>> >> >> +1 >> > I've just tried this github integration and it seems to work (it adds > a comment into related ticket). Where do you want we document this > process ? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
