[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tellier Benoit updated JAMES-2335:
----------------------------------
Description:
Apache James currently relies on commons-configuration, and thus on XML
configuration files.
As such the configuration process has several problems:
- Working with XML is boiler plate
- Working with file leads to a real lack of flexibility.
- For instance, in a cluster environment, we would like all the James
server to share the same configurations.
- Also, in tests, we need to test the different configuration values. We
can not do this without overwriting files, which is dangerous, and boilerplate.
What we need is:
- To represent all possible configuration via java objects.
- Configuration providers should be able to convert the configuration stored
into the java configuration object.
- We should be able to inject different configuration providers from
guice/spring.
It would allow to specify alternative configuration backends (different
formats, different storage techniques) and allow direct injection (for tests
for instance).
Here would be the steps for this work:
- Add a *Initializable* class in *lifecycle-api*. This should be called by
Guice and Sprint at initialization
- *configure* in Configurable will save a Java object (parse the
HierachicalConfiguration into a java object representing it's content).
Initialization will then be done by *Initializable*.
- Then we can move away, object by object, from the *Configurable* interface:
We need to move the configuration parsing in a separated class (behind an
interface). We can register *ConfigurationProviders*, with an
XML/commons-configuration default implementation.
- Deprecate *Configurable*.
- Provide alternative configuration providers, for example, a Cassandra stored
configuration provider
was:
Apache James currently relies on commons-configuration, and thus on XML
configuration files.
As such the configuration process has several problems:
- Working with XML is boiler plate
- Working with file leads to a real lack of flexibility.
- For instance, in a cluster environment, we would like all the James
server to share the same configurations.
- Also, in tests, we need to test the different configuration values. We
can not do this without overwriting files, which is dangerous, and boilerplate.
What we need is:
- To represent all possible configuration via java objects.
- Configuration providers should be able to convert the configuration stored
into the java configuration object.
It would allow to specify alternative configuration backends (different
formats, different storage techniques) and allow direct injection (for tests
for instance).
Here would be the steps for this work:
- Add a *Initializable* class in *lifecycle-api*. This should be called by
Guice and Sprint at initialization
- *configure* in Configurable will save a Java object (parse the
HierachicalConfiguration into a java object representing it's content).
Initialization will then be done by *Initializable*.
- Then we can move away, object by object, from the *Configurable* interface:
We need to move the configuration parsing in a separated class (behind an
interface). We can register *ConfigurationProviders*, with an
XML/commons-configuration default implementation.
- Deprecate *Configurable*.
- Provide alternative configuration providers, for example, a Cassandra stored
configuration provider
> Modernize James configuration
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-2335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2335
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: configuration
> Reporter: Tellier Benoit
> Priority: Major
> Labels: feature, gsoc2018, refactoring
>
> Apache James currently relies on commons-configuration, and thus on XML
> configuration files.
> As such the configuration process has several problems:
> - Working with XML is boiler plate
> - Working with file leads to a real lack of flexibility.
> - For instance, in a cluster environment, we would like all the James
> server to share the same configurations.
> - Also, in tests, we need to test the different configuration values.
> We can not do this without overwriting files, which is dangerous, and
> boilerplate.
> What we need is:
> - To represent all possible configuration via java objects.
> - Configuration providers should be able to convert the configuration stored
> into the java configuration object.
> - We should be able to inject different configuration providers from
> guice/spring.
> It would allow to specify alternative configuration backends (different
> formats, different storage techniques) and allow direct injection (for tests
> for instance).
> Here would be the steps for this work:
> - Add a *Initializable* class in *lifecycle-api*. This should be called by
> Guice and Sprint at initialization
> - *configure* in Configurable will save a Java object (parse the
> HierachicalConfiguration into a java object representing it's content).
> Initialization will then be done by *Initializable*.
> - Then we can move away, object by object, from the *Configurable*
> interface: We need to move the configuration parsing in a separated class
> (behind an interface). We can register *ConfigurationProviders*, with an
> XML/commons-configuration default implementation.
> - Deprecate *Configurable*.
> - Provide alternative configuration providers, for example, a Cassandra
> stored configuration provider
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
