This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

btellier pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project.git

commit 14051e0ce3e37d7c075819d431e417b1f034ee40
Author: Benoit Tellier <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Wed May 29 10:01:28 2019 +0700

    JAMES-2766 ElasticSearch 6 upgrade: Document port configuration changes
    
    ElasticSearch 6 driver is relying on the high-level REST client and no more 
on the internal transport protocol.
    
    Thus, you need to update your configuration files accordingly:
    
    In `elasticsearch.properties` modify the `elasticsearch.port` properties to 
reference the HTTP port of your ElasticSearch
    nodes (**9200** by default instead of the previous default value of 
**9300**).
---
 upgrade-instructions.md | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/upgrade-instructions.md b/upgrade-instructions.md
index 4399a14..88708d5 100644
--- a/upgrade-instructions.md
+++ b/upgrade-instructions.md
@@ -33,6 +33,15 @@ In version 3.3.0 indexing for the Cassandra product was 
handled using ElasticSea
 Note that ElasticSearch APIs had been undergoing some major changes, making a 
smooth migration hard to provide. We proposed 2 migration strategies. A
 simple one leading to major search inconsistencies in the process, and another 
one mitigating these inconsistencies (but getting rid of them).
 
+#### Configuration changes
+
+ElasticSearch 6 driver is relying on the high-level REST client and no more on 
the internal transport protocol.
+
+Thus, you need to update your configuration files accordingly:
+
+In `elasticsearch.properties` modify the `elasticsearch.port` properties to 
reference the HTTP port of your ElasticSearch 
+nodes (**9200** by default instead of the previous default value of **9300**).
+
 ##### Simple strategy
 
 Procedure:


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to