[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16931982#comment-16931982
 ] 

Tellier Benoit commented on JAMES-2884:
---------------------------------------

https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/163 did rename some class to 
closely match RFC-8620 wording.

> Update JMAP implementation to conform to RFC 8620/8621
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JAMES-2884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2884
>             Project: James Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: JMAP
>            Reporter: cketti
>            Assignee: Antoine Duprat
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Historically, James is an early adopter for the JMAP specification, and a 
> first partial implementation was conducted when JMAP was just a draft. IETF 
> draft undergo radical changes and the community could not keep this 
> implementation up to date with the spec changes.
> As off summer 2019, JMAP core ([RFC 
> 8620|https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8620]) and JMAP mail ([RFC 
> 8621|https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8621]) had been officially published 
> (will not change anymore). Thus we should implement these new specifications.
> Point of attention: part of the community actively rely on the actual 'draft' 
> implementation of JMAP existing in James. We should ensure no changes is done 
> to that 'draft' protocol is done while implementing the new one.
> The proposed approach is to keep the current implementation under the 
> `jmap-draft` name, and implement step by step a `jmap` compliant 
> implementation, that will be exposed on a separate port. No modification in 
> `jmap-draft` integration test should be counducted.
> This will allow existing `jmap-draft` clients to smoothly transition to 
> `jmap`, then trigger the classic "deprecation-then-removal" process.
> For now, as a first implementation step, we will only support `jmap` on top 
> of memory-guice (ease testing, speed of development). To ensure a 
> `storage-compliant` behavior of newly introduced storage APIs, we should use 
> persistent datastructures (like the one in vavr) and always deep-copy objects 
> at the storage boundaries.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to