Hi, On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 13:11 +0700, Tellier Benoit wrote: > Hi Matthieu, > > I think this is a great suggestion. > > On 09/12/2019 23:25, Matthieu Baechler wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [...] > > > > Given everything is reactor based, it would be a much better use of > > resources to let the listeners work with `Publisher` type and use > > non- > > block APIs. > I think this is a great suggestion. > > I did try to contribute something similar in the past but did not > carry > out this changeset. > > You have my +1. > > We could probably provide an adapter API to allow non-reactive > > listeners to use the traditional API and wrapping listener calls > > into > > some reactive types. > > > > What would you think about this change? Feedback is more than > > welcome. > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > [1] https://projectreactor.io > > > Can you provide a little Architecture Decision Record ? >
To be honest, I don't expect to write that myself for now. I was working around that topic and gained some insights about it that I will probably forget in the coming weeks. Usually, these ideas are just lost so I now write about it to share. Writing an Architecture Decision Record would mean it's a decision we took (and implemented). It's not the case for now so I didn't wrote it. Now, either we agree about it and it can become an improvement issue in JIRA or we don't and we will let this mail thread die. Does it make sense? Cheers, -- Matthieu Baechler --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
