[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17140116#comment-17140116
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3235:
---------------------------------------
This file only present technical details orthogonal to the rewritting feature:
not including it won't break anything (just a log will be emitted but let's
adress this separately).
I do think that documentation for some Recipent Table Rewriting rules could
make sense for the basic server. I'm thinking to Alias, DomainAlias, Forward &
Group mappings.
But the configuration file is definitly uneeded.
> Clarify Recipient Rewrite Table Configuration (recipientrewritetable.xml)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3235
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3235
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: David Leangen
> Priority: Major
>
> In the context of the *Basic Server*, determine if (1) this configuration is
> necessary, and if so (2) how can we minimize it and (3) document it better.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
