> Why not just refer to Apache James as a ‘mail transfer agent’ and then you > can refer to the LMTP, SMTP, POP3 and IMAP server applications as servers.
Yes, that makes sense. What I wonder about though is what to do about “Mailets”. There are things in James that are not “standard”, but are IMO very important features. Cheers, =David
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
