Hi Eugen, Thanks for your support.
> GIven the discussion around the specific topics I think we are getting > our documentation. > @David: If you can do just that: ask questions and compile the answers > it would be a huge win for us. Thanks, that is indeed the intent since the beginning. The ability to move forward depends on how much everybody participates in answering my (often stupid) questions. I am approaching this from a newbie’s perspective, simply because I am one. As I mentioned in the beginning, (although less and less so now) I have the “advantage” of knowing very little about how James works, so it is easier for me to imagine what it’s like for other newbies trying to learn James, and what needs to be done to help make James more usable and thus more popular. It does require time and patience from everybody though. I hope the efforts will turn out to be worthwhile. Thanks for all the help so far. Please keep it coming!! Cheers, =David
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP