Hi Eugen, Thank you very much for all your efforts. The community is fortunate that you are able to dedicate so much concentrated effort.
> I've given up on building the old site since I failed several times. I think that’s ok, though. Honestly, I don’t see a viable path forward in terms of “migrating” the old docs. Yes, there is some good information still in those docs, and some good stuff that could inspire the new docs, however, I think the only practical way forward is to start over, from a top-down perspective. IMO, we need to make a clean break, and at the same time re-evaluate the James mission. (But that’s just my opinion and I’m just a newbie so my voice doesn’t hold as much weight.) I like the inventory. I can use that as a checklist to make sure the new docs aren’t leaving anything out. Or maybe the old docs could be assembled for the “developer” part of the site, aimed at experienced James developers who already know their way around and just need a reference. But I don’t see how the current docs could be useful for Operators or Integrators who don’t have experience with James. So with that in mind... > I've create two issues to track the progress of migrating the old site > to Antora. > > * Make an inventory of old site > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3301 Cool, thanks! I think this can be useful. > * Migrate the content https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3302 > > Please help out with the inventory and if you have ideas with the content. > > I'll migrate what I can, we can sort them after. I don’t think that’s necessary, but if it’s already done, then great. Thanks again! =David
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
