[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Tellier closed JAMES-3404.
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.6.0
Assignee: Benoit Tellier (was: Antoine Duprat)
Resolution: Fixed
https://github.com/linagora/james-project/pull/3866 contributed this
> Email/query & client Id Resolution
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3404
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: JMAP
> Reporter: Benoit Tellier
> Assignee: Benoit Tellier
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.6.0
>
>
> = Why
> This request should be handled:
> ```
> {
> "using": [ "urn:ietf:params:jmap:core", "urn:ietf:params:jmap:mail",
> "urn:apache:james:params:jmap:mail:shares" ],
> "methodCalls": [
> [
> "Mailbox/set",
> {
> "accountId":
> "29883977c13473ae7cb7678ef767cbfbaffc8a44a6e463d971d23a65c1dc4af6",
> "create": {
> "C42": {
> "name": "myMailbox"
> }
> }
> },
> "c1"
> ], [
> "Email/query",
> {
> "accountId":
> "29883977c13473ae7cb7678ef767cbfbaffc8a44a6e463d971d23a65c1dc4af6",
> "filter" : {
> "inMailboxOtherThan": ["#C42"]
> }
> },
> "c1"]
> }
> ```
> Note that "inMailboxOtherThan" is holding a reference to a previous filter.
> Today we do not handle such requests.
> == Definition of done
> Demonstrate with a memory unit test that this request is supported.
> == How
> Explicit handling of clientIds in methods is a dead end and result in
> extremely complicated code.
> We should handle the substitution upon backreference resolution.
> == Side effect
> It will enable code simplification (we would no longer need to handle
> explicitly clientId in methods as it will be done).
> It will enable clientId support for all further entities with minimal efforts.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
