[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17393034#comment-17393034
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3624:
---------------------------------------
Thanks!
Of course we used `requestId` in the request as well ;-) I will fix it ASAP,
thanks for reporting it!
> RFC 8887 (JMAP over WebSocket) Request needs property 'id' (is 'requestId')
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3624
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3624
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Daniel Gultsch
> Priority: Major
>
> The WebSocket message 'Request' has a property called 'id' according to the
> spec. (Responses will mirror that property in a property called 'requestId'.)
> James however calls this 'requestId'
>
> The unit test here:
> [https://github.com/apache/james-project/blob/master/server/protocols/jmap-rfc-8621-integration-tests/jmap-rfc-8621-integration-tests-common/src/main/scala/org/apache/james/jmap/rfc8621/contract/WebSocketContract.scala#L77]
>
> needs to read:
> {{"id": "req-36",}}
>
> {{(I messed this up in my JMAP library as well. The fix is here:
> [https://github.com/iNPUTmice/jmap/commit/58fa163b8d55e3a6e5be4cf3bbfaca4700963b93]
> )}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
