[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17471344#comment-17471344
]
Benoit Tellier commented on JAMES-3687:
---------------------------------------
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/james/job/ApacheJames/job/PR-826/7/
Pulsar mail queue bringed in some unstable tests
{code:java}
Test Result (4 failures / +4)
org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeByRecipientShouldRemoveSpecificEmail
org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeByRecipientShouldRemoveSpecificEmailWhenMultipleRecipients{List,
MailAddress}[5]
org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeByRecipientShouldRemoveSpecificEmailWhenMultipleRecipients{List,
MailAddress}[6]
org.apache.james.queue.pulsar.PulsarMailQueueTest.removeShouldRemoveMailFromStoreWhenFilteredOut
{code}
> Implements Apache Pulsar based Mailqueue
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3687
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3687
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Queue
> Reporter: Jean Helou
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 2h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> An apache pulsar based mailqueue offers a different set of compromises over
> the existing mailqueue implementations:
> pros:
> * pulsar is a distributed queue
> * pulsar offers scheduling facilities making it easier to implement delayed
> queues
> cons:
> * being fully distributed some consistency guarantees cannot be honored for
> flush and filter since the flushing and filtering commands take time to
> propagate in the cluster
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
