[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Benoit Tellier closed JAMES-351.
--------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Fix

James 2.3 is unmaintained, end of life.

Feel free to reopen if work is planned on this.

> allow "message/disposition-notification" to also attach (excerpts of) the 
> original
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JAMES-351
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-351
>             Project: James Server
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: James Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>         Environment: debian sarge
>            Reporter: Ralf Hauser
>            Assignee: Norman Maurer
>            Priority: Major
>
> org.apache.james.util.mail.handlers.message_disposition_notification.writeTo()
>  blocks anything but Strings.
> As per http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2298.html 3 (d), it is ok also: "If the 
> original message or a portion of the message is to be
>         returned to the sender, it appears as the third component of the 
> multipart/report", therefore the if statement should be replaced by
> if (!((aPart instanceof String) || (aPart instanceof MimeMessage))) {
>             //as per http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2298.html 3 (d) 
>             throw new IOException("Type \"" + aPart.getClass().getName()
>                     + "\" is not supported.");
>         }
>         if ((aPart instanceof MimeMessage)) {
>             try {
>                 ((MimeMessage) aPart).writeTo(aStream);
>                 return;
>             } catch (Exception e) {
>                 //log.error(e.getMessage());
>                 e.printStackTrace();
>                 throw new IOException(e.getMessage());
>             }
>         }
> multipart/reports of this form are handled well by Thunderbird, their 
> attachments are ignored by MS-Outlook 2003.
> Sure, normally such a disposition notification is generated by the UA that 
> james is not to date. But if a UA were to reuse james classes (e.g. a web-app 
> on the server), this might be useful?
> If that RFC is relevant, how about also adding it to 
> http://james.apache.org/rfclist.html?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to