[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Tellier updated JAMES-3819:
----------------------------------
Description:
h3. Why ?
Alternatives like Postfix...
- Do not offer a unified view of the mail queue across nodes
- Requires statefull persistent storage
Given Apache James recent push to adopt a distributed mail queue based on
Pulsar supporting delays (JAMES-3687), it starts making sense developing
tooling for MX related tooling.
I propose myself to mentor a Gsoc on this topic.
h3. Benefits for the student
At the end of this GSOC you will...
- Have a solid understanding of email relaying and associated mechanics
- Understand James modular architecture (mailet/ matcher / routes)
- Have a hands-on expertise in SQL / NoSQL working with technologies like
Cassandra, Redis, JPA...
- Identify fix and solve architecture problems.
- Conduct performance tests and develop an operational mindset
h3. Inventory...
James ships a couple of MX related tools within smtp-hooks/mailets in default
packages. It would make sense to me to move those as an extension.
James supports today...
*checks agains DNS blacklists*. `DNSRBLHandler` or `URIRBLHandler` smtp hook
for instance. This can be moved as an extension IMO.
We would need a little performance benchmark to document performance
implications of activating DNS-RBL.
Finally as quoted by a gitter guy: it would make more sens to have this done as
a MailHook rather as a RcptHook as it would avoid doing the same job again and
over again for each recipients. See JAMES-3820 .
*Grey listing*. There's an existing implementation using JDBC as an underlying
storage.
Move it as an extension.
Remove JDBC storage, propose 2 storage possibilities: in-memory for single
node, REDIS for a distributed topology.
Some work around *whitelist mailets*? Move it as an extension, propose JPA,
Cassandra, and XML configured implementations ? With a route to manage entries
in there for JPA + Cassandra ?
I would expect a student to do his *own little audit* and come up with extra
suggestions!
was:
h3. Why ?
Alternatives like Postfix...
- Do not offer a unified view of the mail queue across nodes
- Requires statefull persistent storage
Given Apache James recent push to adopt a distributed mail queue based on
Pulsar supporting delays (JAMES-3687), it starts making sense developing
tooling for MX related tooling.
I propose myself to mentor a Gsoc on this topic.
h3. Benefits for the student
At the end of this GSOC you will...
- Have a solid understanding of email relaying and associated mechanics
- Understand James modular architecture (mailet/ matcher / routes)
- Have a hands-on expertise in SQL / NoSQL working with technologies like
Cassandra, Redis, JPA...
- Identify fix and solve architecture problems.
- Conduct performance tests and develop an operational mindset
h3. Inventory...
James ships a couple of MX related tools within smtp-hooks/mailets in default
packages. It would make sense to me to move those as an extension.
James supports today...
*checks agains DNS blacklists*. `DNSRBLHandler` smtp hook for instance.
I did get an operational issue here: querying the blacklist on each mail can be
slow. I bet a cache here would make sense to reduce the load on such blacklist.
We could have a non-distributed extension based on a memory cache
We could have a distributed extension based on a Redis cache.
We would also need a little performance benchmark to document performance
implications of activating DNS-RBL.
Finally as quoted by a gitter guy: it would make more sens to have this done as
a MailHook rather as a RcptHook as it would avoid doing the same job again and
over again for each recipients.
*Grey listing*. There's an existing implementation using JDBC as an underlying
storage.
Move it as an extension.
Remove JDBC storage, propose 2 storage possibilities: in-memory for single
node, REDIS for a distributed topology.
Some work around *whitelist mailets*? Move it as an extension, propose JPA,
Cassandra, and XML configured implementations ? With a route to manage entries
in there for JPA + Cassandra ?
Lossly related but a *distributed fail2ban* would be awesome to me!
I would expect a student to do his *own little audit* and come up with extra
suggestions!
> [GSOC] James as a (distributed) MX server
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-3819
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3819
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SMTPServer
> Reporter: Benoit Tellier
> Priority: Major
> Labels: gscoc2023, gsoc
>
> h3. Why ?
> Alternatives like Postfix...
> - Do not offer a unified view of the mail queue across nodes
> - Requires statefull persistent storage
> Given Apache James recent push to adopt a distributed mail queue based on
> Pulsar supporting delays (JAMES-3687), it starts making sense developing
> tooling for MX related tooling.
> I propose myself to mentor a Gsoc on this topic.
> h3. Benefits for the student
> At the end of this GSOC you will...
> - Have a solid understanding of email relaying and associated mechanics
> - Understand James modular architecture (mailet/ matcher / routes)
> - Have a hands-on expertise in SQL / NoSQL working with technologies like
> Cassandra, Redis, JPA...
> - Identify fix and solve architecture problems.
> - Conduct performance tests and develop an operational mindset
> h3. Inventory...
> James ships a couple of MX related tools within smtp-hooks/mailets in default
> packages. It would make sense to me to move those as an extension.
> James supports today...
> *checks agains DNS blacklists*. `DNSRBLHandler` or `URIRBLHandler` smtp hook
> for instance. This can be moved as an extension IMO.
> We would need a little performance benchmark to document performance
> implications of activating DNS-RBL.
> Finally as quoted by a gitter guy: it would make more sens to have this done
> as a MailHook rather as a RcptHook as it would avoid doing the same job again
> and over again for each recipients. See JAMES-3820 .
> *Grey listing*. There's an existing implementation using JDBC as an
> underlying storage.
> Move it as an extension.
> Remove JDBC storage, propose 2 storage possibilities: in-memory for single
> node, REDIS for a distributed topology.
> Some work around *whitelist mailets*? Move it as an extension, propose JPA,
> Cassandra, and XML configured implementations ? With a route to manage
> entries in there for JPA + Cassandra ?
> I would expect a student to do his *own little audit* and come up with extra
> suggestions!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
