0 I have not worked with JDKIM, so I cannot really provide an opinion. The change log looks OK to me though.
Cheers, Karsten OTTO On 10.10.22 3:14 AM, Benoit TELLIER wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose a new vote for 0.3 release of the Apache James > JDKIM library. > > You can find the maven release staged in repository.apache.org as the > artifact #1065: > https://mx.akquinet.de/link?id=BAgAAABb1npazwm5bagAAADHcCHrCt0AsT9tadJeupkvssvZowJcUmvj5mp1QBpkF8GsJ8FO8bVyMbBGR2nLoAmYsTVctdehRnLj9ytVwZDr8-z9d4E8JjL8KGMCEDvP36aYeSORVNGrigJFWff9GFKexVeT2PuPQCavA9ZxM1gDLqP_190Z5utMDh6DZS7WBcX7klf7qdMFGdTb7aCCUKF9LMhLIBE3zcwqwv8tzuZvPOrdYJOOtzw1 > Voting rules: > - This is a majority approval: this release may not be vetoed. > - A quorum of 3 binding votes is required > - The vote starts at Monday 10th of October 2022, 8am UTC+7 > - The vote ends at Monday 17th of October 2022, 8am UTC+7 > > You can answer to it just with +1 and -1. Down-votes may be motivated. > > 3 binding votes are expected move forward on this release. > > Cheers, > > Benoit TELLIER > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
