[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-4026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
René Cordier resolved JAMES-4026.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Been fixed and merged with https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2194
> Fix inconsistency IMAP - JMAP keyword issue for JMAP RFC-8621
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-4026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-4026
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.8.2
> Reporter: René Cordier
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.9.0
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When migrating some tests from jmap draft to jmap rfc, an issue was
> identified regarding conflicts introduced via IMAP on keywords when trying to
> solve it via jmap email/set method
> If we have a message m1 in 2 mailboxes m1 and m2, if we add a flag
> {{\Flagged}} via IMAP on the message in mailbox m2, we create an
> inconsistency for JMAP. Normally, if we set via email/set the flag to
> {{$Flagged}} for m1, it should fix the inconsistency, having the keyword for
> the message present in both mailboxes.
> However, it does not happen right now, as it seems when doing an update on
> email, we do union of keywords regarding the metadata, and if it's the same
> as new flags (which is the case here) then we do nothing, thus not fixing the
> inconsistency.
> The fix is a bit tricky, as some simple solution have been attempted while
> creating issues elsewhere.
> Need to investigate deeper and fix the issue for JMAP RFC implementation
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org
