[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17877348#comment-17877348
]
Wojtek commented on JAMES-2586:
-------------------------------
> Of course have multiple implementations in parallel brings maintenance
> overhead. Not to mention the JPA implementation lags behind in terms of
> features (eg JMAP but not only - using a S3 compatible store for instance
> could be a thing) and I {*}wouldn't personally be confident seeing it used in
> 20+ mailbox deployment{*}.
Touching on the previous point - why? Was there any performance issues
previously and/or performance comparison with new implementation?
Disclaimer point instead of outright deprecations seems sensible though :)
> JPA schema was generated by an ORM and is mostly "accidental". An full data
> migration (likely using tools like imapsync) would be needed.
Thank you for clarification. So it doesn't matter all that much if someone uses
MySQL or PostgreSQL - after all a migration will be needed.
Nevertheless - I still think that it _could_ be possible to make the new
implementation more independent of the underlying database (thus making it good
replacement for [supposedly] non-performant JPA) without sacrificing possible
performance gains of dropping JPA?
> Implement a Postgres-specific backend
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-2586
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2586
> Project: James Server
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Matthieu Baechler
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 235.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> James has a JPA implementation of most interfaces that allows to deploy it on
> top of some popular RDBMS.
> However, while useful for some kind of applications, ORM are usually a bad
> fit for applications requiring high performance like a mail server.
> As an abstraction, it also prevents from using advanced features of a given
> RDBMS.
> For most usages, James would probably run great on top of Postgres, given
> that we use advanced features to implement search, for example.
> A good strategy would be to implement all interfaces implemented by JPA with
> a modern Postgres driver.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]