TL;DR: This email talks about the potential of adding shared mailboxes to James and summarizes our team's initial reflections on design and potential implementation intended to serve as input for discussion.

Hello everyone!

In our company, most of our teams need to have a shared mailbox for their team emails. We are currently in progress of changing our mail stack and have identified James as our preferred option, but the missing support for shared mailboxes is currently a blocker for us. Therefore, we would like to contribute by implementing this feature for James, or at least providing input for a discussion on how an implementation for that could look like.

RELATED EXISTING ISSUES:

- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2182 wants to have the IMAP LIST command return not only mailboxes from the personal namespace, but also from shared namespaces. We are aware of https://github.com/apache/james-project/pull/2445, which was recently merged and implemented that. Although that PR appears to only consider sharing of user mailboxes (from other users' namespaces) at the moment, this should be a great starting point for extension to shared mailboxes in general. - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAILBOX-318 disallowed sharing of a mailbox with users of a different domain. We believe this change to be too restrictive and we would want to ultimately have shared mailboxes containing users of multiple domains. - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-2621 disabled creation of sub-mailboxes in mailboxes not owned by the user. While this makes sense for user mailboxes, we would need to partially lift this restriction for shared mailboxes, where creation of sub-mailboxes should depend on ACLs, not ownership. PR#2445 appears to tackle that as well. - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-1838 disabled support for shared mailboxes altogether. Eventually, the aim should be to revert this.

RELATED IMPLEMENTATIONS:

We are aware of a shared mailbox implementation in the Linagora extension of James (https://github.com/linagora/tmail-backend), but that implementation only works for JMAP at the moment.

DESIGN DISCUSSION:

- Shared mailboxes should reside under a common namespace (probably #shared). - The IMAP LIST, CREATE, DELETE and RENAME commands should support shared mailboxes, while making sure to honour mailbox ACLs according to RFC4314. - In particular, creating sub-mailboxes in shared mailboxes should not be tied to ownership, but the `k` ACL right. Also, for security reasons, it should not be possible to login as the mailbox itself (i.e., as a user with the shared mailbox address as its private address). Creating a user corresponding to a shared mailbox must not be allowed in the first place. - The domain of the shared mailbox to be accessed should not be derived from the domain of the logged-in user, to allow for users from different domains in the same shared mailbox.

-- ACCESS MANAGEMENT

From our point of view, this is the aspect that has the biggest impact on the design, and we have not come to a definite conclusion on how we think it should be handled best.

We believe that newly created sub-mailboxes (henceforth referred to as folders for clarity) should initially inherit the ACL each user had on the parent folder. A naive implementation would then require the shared mailbox ITSELF to also be a folder, as the level-1-subfolders of the shared mailbox would need to derive their ACLs from somewhere.

As an example, consider a shared mailbox #shared/team1@james.domain. To store our root ACLs, we would then need a mailbox #shared/team1@james.domain/team. The actual folders would reside under #shared/team1#james.domain/team/{INBOX;Drafts;...} instead of simply #shared/team1@james.domain/{INBOX;Drafts;...}. However, that would imply that the shared mailbox root (i.e., #shared/team1@james.domain/team) could also store mails itself, which may not be of much semantic sense. Also, mail clients would show INBOX not as a folder of team1@james.domain, but team1@james.domain/team instead.

Alternatively, the shared mailbox could also be entirely encoded in the folder part of the path (i.e., #shared/<staticSharedMailboxOwner>/team1@james.domain), at least internally, which (as the owner is static), could be easily translated and externally represented as only #shared/team1@james.domain.

Note that not having the shared mailbox as a folder itself would no longer enable us to perform access management by looking up ACLs on folders (mailboxes); instead, we would introduce an edge-case, where ACLs of a shared mailbox root would need to be stored somewhere else. Also, simply checking shared mailbox membership would require performing a separate lookup there as well.

IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS:

- Assignment of special-use-flags should be done in a more robust manner. Currently, only mailboxes named exactly INBOX (case-insensitive) will be assigned the INBOX special flag. This is problematic, for example in cases when we are looking at a folder team1/INBOX instead of INBOX. - We believe that the Webadmin API/CLI should be extended to allow editing shared mailbox ACLs, with suggested endpoints "GET /users/{owner}/mailboxes/{mailboxName}/acl", "GET /users/{owner}/mailboxes/{mailboxName}/acl/{user}", "PUT /user/{owner}/mailboxes/{mailboxName}/acl". - The Webadmin API routes for managing mailboxes should be modified to accept (and return) a namespace parameter (or #user for user mailboxes). - We believe the current default path delimiter of "." to be not ideal, as almost every mail address will contain a dot (and thus be split into two components by default, during parsing, as well as in mail clients). We would propose to use "/" as delimiter instead. Alternatively, if changing the delimiter would be too much of a breaking change, path escaping as introduced by PR#2445 for the PathConverter would be always needed.

We would be happy to engage in further discussion on this topic.

Kind regards,
Jan-Eric Hellenberg
for the GIZ Berlin, a German non-profit organization

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to