[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-47?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17940327#comment-17940327
 ] 

Jean Helou commented on JDKIM-47:
---------------------------------

fixed in https://github.com/apache/james-jdkim/pull/15

> James-jdkim should not depend on a logging library implementation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JDKIM-47
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDKIM-47
>             Project: James jDKIM
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tran Hong Quan
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> As discussed: https://github.com/linagora/james-project/issues/4453
> Right now, James-jdkim using log4j as a logging library implementation. 
> James-jdkim himself is a library so it should not depend on any logging 
> implementation and should use slf4j abstraction instead.
> We can use slf4j in src/main and keep log4j in src/test



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to