Jerry Vonau wrote: > Martin Langhoff wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hence the log-file is of interest to me ;-) >> >> Sent it in a private email :-) >> >>> Yes, anaconda-runtime needs to exist in the repositories you use. >> >> Sorry - I should have clarified - anaconda-runtime *is* in the repos >> configured. (otherwise, adding it to the ks wouldn't help anyway!) >> > > "runtime" won't be in the repo that you're "spinning", and that is the > one that buildinstall is going to use: > > if [[ "$REPO" =~ ^/ ]]; then > [ -n "$OUTPUT" ] || OUTPUT=$REPO > REPO="file://$REPO" > > and from the log OUTPUT is set to: > /var/tmp/revisor-pungi/0.5/xs-f9-i386/i386/os > > That is the repo that getting spun right? >
That is the composed tree, yes. From the log files though, you can see that more then one repository is used during buildinstall: Running Command: /usr/lib/revisor/scripts/F9-buildinstall --debug \ --product OLPC School Server --variant xs-f9-i386 --version 0.5 \ --release OLPC School Server 0.5 \ /var/tmp/revisor-pungi/0.5/xs-f9-i386/i386/os \ file:///xsrepos/testing/olpc/7/i386/ \ file:///media/disk/xs/releases/9/Everything/i386/os/ \ http://fedora.laptop.org/xs/testing/olpc/9/i386/ All of these should be searched for the anaconda-runtime package... I'm trying to figure out why it isn't so. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
