On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Douglas Bagnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, a rename and clarification of semantics is quite doable, and > sooner is better. I might be able to do it tonight or tomorrow.
That'd be _fantastic_. > By default, the xs-check script errors if the flag is not there; you > need to use the --tolerate-nosigs option to get the 'you can do > anything' behaviour. I had to read up on xs-check - it's just a simpler friend of xs-sum . Would it not be easier and less suprising if both tools had the same behaviour? We can define that the general concept is that if -e /etc/xs-security-on or "--strict" is passed then be strict, otherwise just check consistency if relevant (xs-sum) which means that xs-check can just shortcut to exit 0 in some cases. But it simplifies our callers significantly. does that sound good? m -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
