On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: > I don't understand this question. My patch only adds it for > xs-activation purposes.
It is about avoiding maintaining a bespoke lib. If you say it is a variant on a python standard lib, do you think we can subclass it? Or is there a reason not to? > It is needed up until Python 3.0, unless you know of a python ordered I saw a commend mentioning that something wouldn't be needed w 2.6. On F11 we have 2.6... but maybe I misunderstood. > Alternative implementations/suggestions welcome :) hmmm. I'll see... m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
