On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Drake <d...@laptop.org> wrote: > I'm worried about the expertise required in order to identify such > repos and packages. We need this process to be doable without me in > the room.
Agreed. > I assume that RHEL is pretty good for server-class hardware found in > US/EU; I can imagine why the support of desktop-class hardware found > in the poorer parts of latin america may be lesser so. Grumble. And we know where our users are. > I haven't yet found a case where the F9-->C6 upgrade adds hardware > support for any hardware that we have here. That's all around bad news. > I like your idea of using a F16 kernel on top of CentOS 6.2. So far, > his seems to be working fine (and solves all of the compatibility > problems mentioned above). If this continues to work I would like to > push it as the default for XS install media. The F15 version of the same kernel that Peter proposes seems sane to me. Still, it's a surprise to me. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com mar...@laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff _______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
