On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Martin Langhoff <mar...@laptop.org> wrote: > Ok. Following the breadcrumbe here, I get to > https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-919 which has a nice patch > authored by the Geoff Cant, a fellow Catalyst-er. I can help w a > rebuild here.
As you've seen - getting this old version to build is difficult. Getting it to run is even harder. I think I've found the issue: it is a client bug, now exposed through ejabberd getting stricter: https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-1533 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 And I have an ejabberd patch to apply (attached) until we've fixed the client and let the fix propogate for a while. We need to fork the ejabberd package again, at least for the time being. Would you prefer for this fork to be named 'ejabberd' (with xs-setup modifying the EPEL repo file to exclude ejabberd upgrades from epel), or ejabberd-xs as before? Thanks Daniel
persist-all-pubsub.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
