It probably will not be that hard for someone familiar with OLPC OS builder to port it to CentOS 7 and make a release. CentOS 7 is a close cousin of Fedora builds which already have been used for XO releases.
Possibly a more interesting question is which version of Sugar will make it into EPEL[*] for RHEL/CentOS 7. EPEL 6 still has Sugar 0.88. [*] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Adam Holt <h...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Sameer Verma <sve...@sfsu.edu> wrote: > >> On Jul 20, 2014 11:57 AM, "Anish Mangal" <anis...@umich.edu> wrote: >> > When I had checked the release notes a few days ago, there wasn't any >> ARM support, at least officially. >> >> Keeping that constraint in mind, it may still be worthwhile to try out >> the build process on CentOS 7. I didn't get much success on CentOS 6.X. >> >> It may also be worthwhile to explore the portability of the >> ansible-driven install process on Debian for ARM. >> > FWIW project leader's release announcement (at planet.centos.org etc) say: > > "Coming Soon. We are currently working to extend the portfolio of content > we deliver for a major release. In the past its only been iso media and > install tree’s, but with CentOS-7 we are also going to deliver...As a part > of the expanded Core efforts, we are also going to attempt to deliver a > CentOS-7 release for 32bit x86, ARM and PowerPC in the coming months." > > Similarly he wrote in March: > > "ARM32 build effort on CentOS-7beta ( and ongoing ). We’ll see you on > the Arm-Dev mailing list" > http://karan.org/blog/2014/03/26/the-arm-plan-for-centos/ >
_______________________________________________ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
