I personally agree. > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: giovedì 3 luglio 2003 10.13 > To: 'James Users List' > Subject: RE: Anyone still using JDK 1.3? > > > Can we say that James 3 will require JDK 1.4? This would seem a reasonable > breakpoint. > > It would be good to be able to use JDK 1.4 features without worrying about > backward compatibility. > > As it stands, James' source is not JDK 1.4 compatible due to JDBC 3 being > introduced in JDK 1.4. JDBC 3 is not source compatible with JDBC 2 as used > by James'. See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4/compatibility.html, item 10. > James' Ant build detects the presence of JDBC 3 and uncomments > the required > code, so it can be compiled using JDK 1.4. > > Moving forward it would be good to be able to drop such > workarounds - just > in time for JDK 1.5! > > -- Steve > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 03 July 2003 06:28 > > To: James-User Mailing List > > Subject: Anyone still using JDK 1.3? > > > > > > James still supports JDK 1.3, but lately we're wondering if > > anyone still > > cares. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
