> one thing that I was hoping James could provide was programmatic
fast-fail.
> The reasons listed "for" this feature on the above page seem to miss the
> most obvious: The ability to return an SMTP error to the sending MTA.
I thought I had listed that; it certainly is one of my reasons. Although a
properly formated (RFC 1894) bounce message works, clients handle protocol
rejection better.
However, your examples sound like a VERP issue.
In any event, if you want to discuss it, server-dev would be the more
appropriate place. And pleas search the archives and wiki for prior
discussion.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
