Brian C. Dilley wrote on Wednesday, October 22, 2003:
>    Are there any published performance metrics for james?

Someone on the list just posted some benchmark data last week.  I'll take the liberty 
of copying the message here.  I think they were running RedHat.

Sudip Shekhawat wrote on Thursday, October 16, 2003:
>Finally we have some real numbers!! The stress test on James concluded.
>
>Test Scenario:
>1. We used two servers running james 2.2.08a. We start by sending ëní 
>mails/min to server1. Server1 processes these mails and sends them to 
>server2. Server2 ghosts the mails.
>2. The servers were 2.4 Ghz Pentium 4 with 1 GB of memory.
>3. We used mySQL 4.0.13 and JDBC connector 3.0.9
>4. JDK 1.4.2 was used with the ñserver option and we also set the JVM heap 
>to be 384 MB.
>5. By using trial and error and some logic we came up with the optimal 
>number of spool threads to be 12 and the outgoing threads to be 20 for 
>server1.
>6. Server2 used 100 spool threads.
>7. Maxcache was set to be 125.
>8. We used james database repository. By making james and jamesís database 
>repository use the same server leads to contention of CPU time and james 
>doesnít perform to its fullest. Therefore the database repository (mySQL) 
>was installed on a different server.
>9. Max connection for the database was set to 20.
>
>Method:
>1. We started by sending 800 mails/min to server1. We were constantly 
>following up with the spool size of James.
>2. We kept increasing the mails/min till we saw a rate when james couldnít 
>handle 100% of the mails.
>
>Results:
>1. James was able to process (receiver/process/send) all of the 800 
>mails/min.
>2. As we increased the rate, James comfortably processed around 2600 
>mails/min with a CPU usage of 70% for James and the CPU usage of 30% for 
>mySQL
>3. When we reached 2800 mails/min, the spool started increasing in size and 
>the number of mails processed per min started decreasing. The decrease was 
>exponential with the increase in the number of messages/min. When we sent 
>4000 mails/min, james processed 400 mails/min.
>
>Conclusion:
>James with our current configuration can handle 2600 mails/min which is 
>pretty neat.
>
>Thanks
>Sudip
______________________________________________________
James Bucanek       <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to