Neill Robbins wrote: > > However, my original point still remains. The MimeMessageWrapper > appears to be inconsistent with respect to which functions it updates > the internal header cache for and which it doesn't. I don't see that > there is any particular reason why there should be a > difference between > the set functions which do update the header cache and those that > don't...
Are you calling MimeMessageWrapper.saveChanges()? This is a requirement of the JavaMail API to write everything back to the message. -- Steve - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - This private and confidential e-mail has been sent to you by Synergy Systems Limited. It may not represent the views of Synergy Systems Limited. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please notify the sender by replying with "received in error" as the subject and then delete it from your mailbox.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
