Try evolution, it's a great (free like beer) client.

On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 02:12, Ray Tran wrote:
> I use kmail/kde3.1 at home, and I have noticed exactly the same variable
> performance. If I use a different mail client to the same servers, then
> the performance is consistently quick. I don't know why kmail is inconsistent,
> and my colleague who is a KDE developer can't explain it either but it is.
> Incidentally the servers I use are at a variety of locations, and probably
> a variety of different types of server - but kmail is always the same.
> 
> I suggest you try another client just to verify where the performance issues are,
> then go back to kmail if there are features you can't live without. Personally
> I think kmail has enough features that I can live with the quirks :-)
> 
> Mark Swanson wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > I've been noticing over the past few days that pop3 requests sometimes happen 
> > really fast, and sometimes timeout. I'm always testing James over a local 
> > network. Searching the archives doesn't show anything and I'm wondering if 
> > perhaps I should upgrade from 2.1.3 to the 2.2 branch?
> > (The client I always use is kmail/kde3.1)
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to