"Roy Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.. thanks Serge. If I ever graduate from James-101 then maybe I'll be in a
position to offer some assistance - although it would be restricted to the
documentation area I think.
Like you said, we need help with documentation, so if you have time to spare, it's always appreciated. :)
Couple more questions for you if I may:
1) Will the merge and next stable cut be a 2.x or 3.0 ? Obviously not
crucial, more just curious ...
It will be 3.0.
2) I'm still in evaluation mode just now with only a small number of users.
Would I be as well to move to 2.2 now or should I stick with 2.1.3 ? I guess
the underlying question really is "Is 2.2 now good enough, or is it still
considered flakey?"
The 2.2.x releases are pretty stable. In some ways they are more stable since there were several important fixes (most important being a DNS resolution bug I think), but since it doesn't have nearly as many people using it, it's potentially unstable in other ways.
So don't drop it in production blindly, but I think 2.2.x are good enough to use.
-- Serge Knystautas
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
