I don't believe it will.  I put up James in the fall (had an expired server
and dreaded re-installing exchange).  I was concerned about this too.  I
went to www.ordb.org to have it tested and it passed.  My firewall is set to
accept from anywhere and send to anywhere but only from the one ip (which is
a natted private IP).  Given that you can put up James in 1/2 hour, give it
a try.

hope that helps

bill page


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lahu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 9:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: "Open-Relay" Problem - ORDB, MAPS etc.
>
>
> Hi eveybody,
> I m a pretty satisfied JAMES user. So far, JAMES has
> pleased me on almost every account. (Though, I helped
> catch a service-level (i.e. SMTP, NNTP, POP)
> "connectionLimit" bug)
>
> However, I see a growing concern amongst my peers for
> the "open-relay" thing. I want to inquire that, can
> JAMES be possibly listed in the blacklists (ORDB, MAPS
> etc.).
>
> I m asking because JAMES accepts the messages from ANY
> IP address. However, later when we use the
> "RemoteAddrNotinNetwork" mailet/matcher pair, we can
> successfully dispatch the mail to the SPAM folder
> (though, still accepting the message), which indicates
> that the SMTP session had been successfully completed.
> This, in effect, makes JAMES a blackhole for the
> spammers i.e. it does not relay the emails. ASSUME
> that i m unable to use the SMTP AUTH.
>
> On the other hand, can this behaviour cause RBL's like
> ORDB, MAPS etc. to believe that this mail server
> (JAMES) is configured as open relay ? What I mean to
> ask here is that, when these RBL organizations (ORDB,
> MAPS etc.) perform their automated tests, would they
> declare JAMES as "open relay" only on the basis of the
> fact that it accepted the emails OR rather would they
> go great lengths verifying whether actually that mail
> was relayed or not ?
>
> I hope I made it clear. Pardon me for not expressing
> it the concise way as English is not my primary
> language.
>
> P.S: Do I sound like I m asking for an ESMTP-like
> feature ??? Coz, I believe (correct me, if I m wrong)
> ESMTP can reject the mail-connection altogether if it
> does not come from an allowed IP address!! Is this the
> case ?
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
> http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to