I agree it's a solution , but not the most clever one!!! Why would I add
network overhead ??
There is not a way to gain access to the existing objects??


> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: Zuul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Enviada em: sexta-feira, 16 de abril de 2004 15:14
> Para: James Users List
> Assunto: Re: NotRemoteManager
> 
> 
> You can write a wrapper that uses the telnet protocol to send 
> commands to 
> remote manager. That solution worked seamlessly for my webapp 
> and it is 
> very straight forward and easy to implement. Just make sure 
> you handle 
> error conditions for non-existant accounts on user commands. 
> ___ Sent with SnapperMail www.snappermail.com
> 
> ...... Original Message .......
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:54:04 -0300 "Diogo Saad" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >
> >I wanna develop a new Component that has the same functionalities of 
> >the
> RemoteManager, but not connection oriented.
> >I wanna develop a web interface to manage the server ( add 
> users , set
> password , set alias , etc) , this means a servlet calling this new 
> Component....
> >This new Component would have to hold a reference to the MailServer
> instance , and to the UsersRepository instance...
> >How do I get this instances???
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >Diogo Saad
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Inter Business Tecnologia e Servicos
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to