|
We are using James to send email for a challenge response
anti-spam tool we developed inhouse. When we ran the server on a Windows environment, it seemed
to work fine, but now that we have moved it to Linux, we are getting odd errors
on "bounced" addresses. Essentially, when we send a challenge, the return address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Here is what I am seeing in the James log 07/10/04 08:10:55 INFO James: Processing a bounce
request for a message with an empty return path. No bounce will be sent. 07/10/04 08:10:55 INFO James: Processing a bounce
request for a message with a return path header. The bounce will be sent
to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/10/04 08:10:55 INFO James: Processing a bounce
request for a message with an empty return path. No bounce will be sent. 07/10/04 08:11:55 INFO James: Processing a bounce
request for a message with a return path header. The bounce will be sent
to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/10/04 08:11:55 INFO James: Processing a bounce
request for a message with an empty return path. No bounce will be sent. 07/10/04 08:11:55 INFO James: Processing a bounce
request for a message with a return path header. The bounce will be sent
to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/10/04 08:11:56 INFO James: Processing a bounce
request for a message with an empty return path. No bounce will be sent. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] actually points to our
exchange environment where the challenge response application uses imap to pull
inbound responses from challenged addresses. I am using the same config.xml file from the previous environment
except for a few minor adjustments for the fetchmail includes. This is
still disabled. Can anyone provide any suggestions on why this may be
happening? It almost seems like James needs to be told to send the error
to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
but shouldn't the return path header address that? Bill Callahan |
