> Noel J. Bergman wrote: > > Actually, the real core issue wasn't listed. The normal RemoteDelivery > > mailet was explicitly configured with ITS OWN address as the > gateway. Hence > > Is this something we'd want, or even could, prevent?
Personally i use this 'feature' in a test server - stops any mail getting routed externally, and allows mail to get resent back into the system for second time round processing. >I would like to point out that James is a powerful tool which gives >you great freedom and doesn't draw much distinction between possible >and desirable. We're not nannies, here to protect people from >themselves. The biggest plus point for james for me, is that it's open source java - when i dont like the way it does somthing / want to do somthing it doesnt provide, i head straight for the source code! You wouldnt get me doing that with a C mail server :) Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
