> > Can someone explain what are the differences between the > > 2_1_fcs and the trunk branches? > > Intentional differences: > > - trunk has a released and updated version of Phoenix, > which meant changes to lifecycle interfaces. > - trunk has a redone Ant script > - trunk has some experimental changes that won't be kept. > > Unintentional differences are functional things, such as the > new list server > in branch_2_1_fcs that isn't in trunk or just bug fixes. >
Noel, we have two branches and two major versions. I am sure the difficulty in maintaining these difference been discussed. Is there any consensus in making the migration of branch_2_1_fcs into trunk a priority ?? I'd also like to discuss the difference between versions 2.x and 3.0 - are we at a point where we can lock down 2.x and release 3.0 or do we need to keep 2.x alive because of JVM versioning ?? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
