Ok Stefano,
could you please open a Jira issue describing the enhancement requested (just for tracking)? After that I will apply and commit the changes, unless someone jumps up with some reason against it.
Vincenzo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read the RFC and I've not found anything saying there are problems offering the AUTH keywords in the EHLO response when authentication is not required.
The "250-AUTH" answers simply says that the server correctly handle a set of SMTP commands: they doesn't imply that the server really supports user authentication.
Stefano
Such behaviour can be attained just changing four "if (authRequired) {...}" statements to "if (true) {...}" in SMTPServer.doHelo(String) and SMTPServer.doEhlo(String).
Does anybody know if doing this simple change would create any problem? Should we make this behaviour optional?
Vincenzo
I didn't read the RFC about EHLO "AUTH" extension and its behaviour. IMHO this changed behaviour should not break anything but I will look into the specification if noone has knowledge about this.
Stefano
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
